SpongeBob SquarePants


< User:AMK152 | Redirected from User talk:AMK152/Archive Three

on ESB
Add New Page
Add New Page Talk0
  1. Archive One (June 2007 - February 2009)
  2. Archive Two (February 2009 - April 2009)
  3. Archive Three (April 2009 - September 2009)
  4. Archive Four (September 2009 - July 2010)
  5. Archive Five (July 2010 - June 2011)
  6. Archive Six (June 2011 - present)


You know if these episodes are there?

Season 7

  • 124a Patties with Eggs  :May 27, 2009
  • 124b Suspended  :May 26, 2009
  • 125a Plankton's Failing Attempts  :May 4, 2009
  • 125b Uncle Sherm's Visit  :May 8, 2009
  • 126a Duel!  :May 4, 2009
  • 126b SpongeMan SuperHeroPants  :May 6, 2009
  • 127a The Origin of Krabby Patties :May 7, 2009
  • 127b Stained Pants  :May 6, 2009
  • TBA To SquarePants or Not to SquarePants  :July 19, 2009

Season 6

  • 116a Matchmaker  :May 7, 2009
  • 116b Squilliam's Fancy Plan :May 5, 2009
  • 119a The Truth of Gold  :May 6, 2009
  • 119b Sea of Dolphin  :May 7, 2009

-- 17:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

None of those are soruced except for "To SquarePants or Not to SquarePants." -AMK152(talkcontribs) 04:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


Could you fix 116b on SpongeBob SquarePants (season 6), please. The episode is "Squid's Visit". --Brandon J. Marcellus 22:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Done. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 04:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Relase dates

You know the relase dates of Shell Shocked, Gullible Pants, and Overbooked? --Qwwwwww 08:48, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Not yet. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 03:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

New episodes

Could you fix 116b, 119 on SpongeBob SquarePants (season 6) and 122a, 122b, 123 on SpongeBob SquarePants (season 7), please. The episodes are:

116a : To SquarePants or Not to SquarePants

116b : Squid's Visit

119  : Neptune's Party

122a : Overbooked

122b : Gullible Pants

123 : The Great Escape!

--Emile234topsec 15:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I only see sources for the production numbers of 116a and 116b. The rest are unsourced. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 03:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Two things

I am now the B'crat and admin at the German Language wiki. I was wondering if you would be kind enough to come over there and give me some support. No need to speak German. I just need some one who can help out with building articles. Also, I asked for a lock down of the Wiki to disable all IP edits for a week. That I believe has gone through. So you and the others can start clean's messy...very very messy. - Rgoodermote  03:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry make that just admin. Anyways, sorry a lot of my time is going to go into building that Wiki up. Things here are pretty calm. Just a clean up is required. - Rgoodermote  03:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


You beat me to it. I was going to do that this afternoon, but I got caught up offline. I saw someone earlier that I was really hoping would apply, but they didn't. We can nom, but I feel that right now no admin should nom some one as our vote should carry a bit more weight than the others and as so our nomination would be a snowball from the get go. We only carry weight for now, I hope that some day we will have more qualified and respected editors later so that we can then be even or even below the regular editors. - Rgoodermote  04:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Episode list changes

Just some changes I would like you to make, AMK. I have a couple of sources. XD

Season 6

Source: Click here and search Gullible Pants.

Also, No Hat for Pat airs July 6, 2009. Source: Click here

Season 7

Looking above, move Gullible Pants and Overbooked to season six, with explained reasons above.

There is also no known air date for Chum Caverns or Chum Bucket Supreme (I predict the SpongeBash marathon, but I have no source.) Maybe stating them TBA would fix this situation? TheEd (Talk) 07:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Updated. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 20:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Manual of Style

Alright, I copied over the Manual of Style from the Narutopedia. It needs a lot of work. It'd be nice to see you put some of what you'd like to see the articles on this Wiki look like. I did some minor tweaks and I know I missed a few. - Rgoodermote  19:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


I was at IRC and after a huge argument with everyone, I did get a nice suggestion, how about we grant rollbacker to everyone who edits? Also, may I request B'Crat so that this can be easier and also because I'm here daily..just not editing..the site is doing well..anyways, the idea behind is that if we grant Rollbacker to everyone we'll have more people who will do more work and more work means better edits. We can of course create a policy to make sure it isn't abused. Those who make a certain amount of good rollbacks can be then granted the Sysops tool for a set time to see how they do, then if they do well we can then decide if that person keeps the tool or not. How does it sound? - Rgoodermote  21:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Another idea, we setup a team of editors who go out and advertise for this Wiki. - Rgoodermote  21:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Post your request for Bcrat at the RFA page. I would grant you B'crat status, but let's see what the community says. You've been doing a great job. Also, what about granting rollback to all people who have reached a certain number of edits, such as 100, of course those who we havn't had a problem with? -AMK152(talkcontribs) 03:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Your Wiki

Well I setup another version of this Wiki at, here. I'd like for you to come along and help out. I am the founder there. I am thinking that we spread out as far as possible and attract more editors to both. Both will have different rules and different setups. Both will have the same subject. This now means that I am now a rep for another wiki. I hope to have you on board. - Rgoodermote  22:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


Sorry about my inactivity, I've hit an extremely busy spot in my life and obviously the Internet is not top of my priority list. I'll be back in maybe a week or two. Sorry again. - Rgoodermote  05:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

It's okay. I too, have been busy in real life. I'm going to put as much time as I can into this wiki, especially in mid-July, during the 10th Anniversary celebration. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 14:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Episode titles revealed!

The episodes for the SpongeBash marathon have been revealed. Most of them are season seven. These all air on July 19 from 7PM-9PM. Listed in production order. Check the source for their plots.

Complete source with details and plots: scroll down to the bottom for SpongeBob.

Note: Chum Caverns is not airing, so we can't assume its production numbers yet. TheEd (Talk)

Thanks. I'll add them right now. Finally! Goo Goo Gas will air! -AMK152(talkcontribs) 13:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I'm back

Hey, the title says it. Also about that new blog thing, we need a new policy on that. I was thinking enforcing a rule that makes sure there is no off wiki conversations and nothing that could be offensive to users (I.E. Religion, Personal attacks and so on). My other one is just block everyone who uses it because it's useless and making sure everyone here knows that. - Rgoodermote  23:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

It was pretty easy, I told them not to give it to us...however long that promise will last I don't know...- Rgoodermote  00:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Let's give it a run, we need some policies though. - Rgoodermote  00:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree. If they're not going to edit this wiki for it's actual purpose, it won't hurt blocking them. We can just make a page of policies, announce it on the site notice, and that will let everyone know what the rules are. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 20:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and created a list of rules I myself think should be added. I also made them firm rules without community consent as I don't believe we currently have a community that is very active. I've also gone ahead and made a place for people to say they are active and give us suggestions. I'd like to make our activities transparent, I think with an account that is shared between the admin that has a blog that updates with everything. This will also help and cut down the usage of the Site notice. This account also shouldn't be given any tools at all and all edits should be directly toward the blog. I don't know when the blog extension comes long, but I see a new option in the special pages list so I imagine we have it. Also, how will we go about my B'crat nomming? I don't think I'm going to get any votes for we don't have a lot of people that I know of. - Rgoodermote  02:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

(undent)Thank you and I will not abuse the privilege. Hey, I need to ask, would you like to come and give me a hand at my wiki? Here it is, it is one that I think you'd enjoy being at. I'm going to grant you B'Crat and Sysop when you get there, I can also create an account for you if that is what you would prefer and then grant you the tools. It's a much better and way past updated wiki that is much much much more free...I just need some much going on and so little support from those I've granted tools. Oh and in edition, we got Gadgets there. ^^ - Rgoodermote  19:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Just found out

I found a way of having a free service to host a wiki. The same goes for getting a URL. Like this is my personal Wiki and it's running on a home server. It's a program called XAMPP and it runs on all the major OS's (Linux, Windows and Mac). Dyndns is where I got the URL, lovely I sound like a spokesperson. XD; But I have to say I like this, cept the Wiki takes up a lot of CPU and RAM. - Rgoodermote  16:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, AMK152! I know we don't now each other that good, but can I become Admin? I'll let you think it over. -- Terminator234 04:12, 7 July 2009 (BST)

Wonderful suggestion

I got to talking with Scarecroe and he gave me an awesome couple of suggestions, read em' here. What do you think? - Rgoodermote  18:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Good idea. What about having one notice, such as the newest notice, then have a link to lead them to the list of other annoucements. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 20:47, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
That would work actually. What do you have in mind for the name of said pages? - Rgoodermote  21:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


Hello, AMK,

I am the an admin from SpongeBob Fanon Wiki. I was wondering if you do one little thing, Can you add the website to the MediaWiki:Monaco-sidebar? If you can maybe you can add it like this: []|Spongebob Fanon Wiki.

-Phin68 talk to Phin68 20:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Done. Could you link this Wiki from the Fanon Wiki too? -AMK152(talkcontribs) 04:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Sure, Why not? Thank you so much for doing what you did. But can you say somthing like Spongebob Fanon Wiki instead of just Fanon Wiki? Phin68 talk to Phin68 21:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Done. - Rgoodermote  23:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


Should we allow the music to continue to be made? It's just been a general agreement to delete them, but I noticed you created Category:Associated Production Music and now I don't know what to think. I'm going to vote for keep and refine and also give them their own namespace (Like Music:). - Rgoodermote  23:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, I believe the actual songs should maintain their own articles (F.U.N. Song, Best Day Ever, Krusty Krab Pizza, etc.). Since the production music articles have relatively small articles, then it may be best just to put all the information on one article. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 21:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
That would be wise, should we get the editors on it? Also, I asked for IPs to be disabled. I'm hoping it'll slow vandalism and give us more time to look through and fix things. It'll also help by giving us more editors with accounts so we can keep better track of things. Also, should I move over the songs like F.U.N. to their own namespace like Music:F.U.N.? - Rgoodermote  22:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Songs like F.U.N., Best Day Ever, etc. should remain in the main namespace. The production music should have their own article. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 03:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

(undent)That works, in addition, I think we should form something similar to Wikipedia's Arbcom, not needed RIGHT now, however in time such a setup could come in handy in deciding new rules and actions. However as we are right now such a thing is completely useless, it's reserved for a much more active wiki with a larger community. But I'd like to pass that to you. - Rgoodermote  20:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Done. The Arbcom is a good idea for when we have more contributors. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 18:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Dude you're fast, I was going to get to that a little while ago and saw you had already done it. Hey, where do you think we can go to recruit more people? I'm thinking forums and Spongepedia (they are extremely stubborn ((I say that as a good thing)) even while facing certain death so asking them to move to us is not an option), any ideas on forums? We already have Spongepedia users here and their support. - Rgoodermote  21:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
I have put a link at several Wikipedia articles to here and I also know that people at forums know about us, because they have referenced us many times. I'm sure there are other places we can advertise, maybe other forum sites, if they allow us to. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 21:52, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
I'll hunt out some forums, but I'm not sure there are a lot out there that work with Spongebob in more than a small portion of the community. Also, how would we go about teaching them the ins and outs of a Wiki? Set up a tutorial? Or do we have one? - Rgoodermote  23:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
There are help pages at Category:Help. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 22:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Another new SpongeBob Wikia rule

There are many episodes that has the articles that says "we see" or even "I can". This gets annoying because this builds up confusion between viewers and the episode itself, so I kept on removing them. Can you add up the rule about avoiding the words "We" and "I"? JMBZ-12 20:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Encouraging increased participation - Reply

I was thinking of an editor of a month actually. Any idea of when we can set that up? Also you have anything for the next article/quote/picture of the week? As for teams I was about to make one related to Antvandalism yesterday (CVU) This is my idea for teams

  • Must be related to improving the Wiki (similar to projects on Wikipedia)
  • There must be a minimum of five editors active on the team for it to be considered active. So that means before you even set it up make sure you got enough people
  • Prizes can be handed out, however I added a rule that forbid that because I couldn't think of an award. However I now remember we can create barnstars for each team (well not us the team leader)
  • Only one admin per team and that person must be elected via the RfAs, but we must make it clear that we don't vote on this Wiki, that we only weigh in....I.E. if the B'crat doesn't feel the person is ready despite a high number of users saying ok then the person doesn't get the tool.
  • Um, you think of the rest.

- Rgoodermote  00:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh and the administration should be changed to refer to B'crats as they have the most rights...that's just my opinion. - Rgoodermote  00:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree. But I think we should create a few teams focusing on broad tasks, then as it grows, we can branch them off. We could start with two, one for maintaining organization/quality and one for decreasing spam and vandalism as you said.
Quality Control Team - makes sure that articles are formatted correctly, categorized, and free of spelling and grammer mistakes.
Vandalism and Spam Patrol Team - reverts vandalism and spam and reports vandals and spammers to sysops.

-AMK152(talkcontribs) 23:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

(undent) I call Vandalism and Spam Patrol leader, we've gotta rack up at least 5 people and we need to start creating barnstars. - Rgoodermote  02:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

What should we call these "teams?" -AMK152(talkcontribs) 02:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
(Off topic: I'll tell you what is going on with the pages not loading when..they start to load right), well I think for the anti-vandal spam it should be Counter Vandalism Unit or CVU like Wikipedia's. That should garner instant respect...or mockery depending on people. - Rgoodermote  03:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The Fanon Wiki's Theme


Do you know who made the lastest theme here? My wiki despretly needs a theme. Thanks in advance. Phin68 talk to Phin68 14:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Are you talking about the logo, background, and color schemes? -AMK152(talkcontribs) 17:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

No, just the background. Phin68 talk to Phin68 13:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
You know, the bubbles... Phin68 talk to Phin68 20:15, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Put this:

.color2 {
   background: #080808 url(;

on the SpongeBob Fanon Wiki's "MediaWiki:Monaco.css"

-AMK152(talkcontribs) 22:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

User Badge

Hey, I requested they give us the Userbadge extension, they have done so. It could be very useful. - Rgoodermote  00:20, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Greetings from a Sister Wiki

Today we had a vandalism attack from what is apparently a ticked-off SpongeBob editor. Normally as a site admin I would deal with the vandalism and I wouldn't bring this to your attention, but from my research it appears that User:Jleer was mighty offended at what User:ResonX placed on their talk page and (I feel) rightly so. As Jleer had only made the one mainspace edit here and was quite possibly a completely new editor to the wiki, I can understand their outrage (but certainly not their resulting actions) at the message that ResonX left on their talk page. I understand that ResonX has high expectations, but the complete lack of understanding or basic courtesy that was shown I thought should be brought to your attention. Jleer apparently felt that ResonX not only was officially representing your wiki, but Wikia as a whole. The result was damage by a ticked-off newbie at other Wikia projects. I don't know if others have complained about ResonX's notes, but I thought you should be made aware of the situation. Best wishes, Kiefer 17:18, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

I will take care of it. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 17:57, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
We should probably make an official warning template in light of this. Also, AMK, I think a stronger warning should have been given to ResonX, this isn't the first time an admin has told him off, I've already done so once before. He has good intentions, which is why I don't think we should resort to any form of blocking or banning. But we should give him sterner warnings, also it may be best to make clear who represents us...I've already elected myself for that position..but it's best to talk about it and see who we can send out...I myself think TheEd is a very good choice, very calm, friendly to talk to and knows how to get things done. That's all for my nosiness. - Rgoodermote  22:46, September 3, 2009 (UTC)



You don't own SpongeBob Fanon, Arre 320 does. He's currently inactive so I'm pretty much in charge now. And also, TheEd can help you with the episode tables. Phin68 talk to Phin68 22:15, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

Wikia Spotlight

Random Wiki