Wikia

SpongeBob SquarePants

  • Do not correct a another person's message, no matter what.

      Loading editor
    • But you correct everyone here, ALL THE TIME.

        Loading editor
    • <time raffled>

        Loading editor
    • DUde, 120d. YOU FREAKING CORRECT EVERYONE FOR THE LITTLEST FREAKING THING! AUGHHHHHHHH

        Loading editor
    • Goldenburg111 wrote:
      Go get a life 120d, your annoying.

      Amen brother! Ha ha ha ha!

      TanHamMan 00:37,5/4/2014   

        :D 

        Loading editor
    • That is not what I meant. I tell them what they did wrong. He changed the quote. A teacher can do one of two things: Correct an assignment or grade an assignment. There is a difference.

        Loading editor
    • Goldenburg111 wrote:
      Go get a life 120d, your annoying.

      If I could block you for harassment I would.

        Loading editor
    • Goldenburg111 that is not appropriate.

        Loading editor
    • You can change it.

      If it has something like (Bad word 11) then they can change it.

      Plus, it's better to change, then it looks better, and no changes have to be added on the thread, and then we don't look silly.

        Loading editor
    • said the guy who bothers Amk.

        Loading editor
    • 120d wrote:
      That is not what I meant. I tell them what they did wrong. He changed the quote. A teacher can do one of two things: Correct an assignment or grade an assignment. There is a difference.

      Only because Tanhamman made a typo.

        Loading editor
    • 120d wrote:
      Goldenburg111 wrote:
      Go get a life 120d, your annoying.
      If I could block you for harassment I would.

      Says the Crat blocker dude:(

        Loading editor
    • Tanhamman wrote:
      You can change it.

      If it has something like (Bad word 11) then they can change it.

      Plus, it's better to change, then it looks better, and no changes have to be added on the thread, and then we don't look silly.

      It is not okay to do that. It would be like changing a famous line in Gettysburg Address. Instead of saying "Four score and seven years ago..." someone says "87 years ago..." It changes one's view of that person.

        Loading editor
    • 120d is right, it is disrespectful to change someone's comment, even if it's a typo. But seriously. Don't make a big deal about this.

        Loading editor
    • 120d wrote:
      Tanhamman wrote:
      You can change it.

      If it has something like (Bad word 11) then they can change it.

      Plus, it's better to change, then it looks better, and no changes have to be added on the thread, and then we don't look silly.

      It is not okay to do that. It would be like changing a famous line in Gettysburg Address. Instead of saying "Four score and seven years ago..." someone says "87 years ago..." It changes one's view of that person.

      All I did was change "ahve" to "have," and now you're talking about the Gettysburg Address.

        Loading editor
    • lol

        Loading editor
    • Muchacha wrote:
      120d wrote:
      Tanhamman wrote:
      You can change it.

      If it has something like (Bad word 11) then they can change it.

      Plus, it's better to change, then it looks better, and no changes have to be added on the thread, and then we don't look silly.

      It is not okay to do that. It would be like changing a famous line in Gettysburg Address. Instead of saying "Four score and seven years ago..." someone says "87 years ago..." It changes one's view of that person.
      All I did was change "ahve" to "have," and now you're talking about the Gettysburg Address.

      What I am saying is that even a typo is important.

        Loading editor
    • we are not grammar wiki!

        Loading editor
    • Goldenburg111 wrote:
      we are not grammar wiki!

      What are you talking about?

      This wiki needs to be grammatically correct.

        Loading editor
    • 120d wrote:
      Goldenburg111 wrote:
      we are not grammar wiki!
      What are you talking about?

      This wiki needs to be grammatically correct.

      Exactly why I fixed the typo.

        Loading editor
    • 120d wrote:

      Goldenburg111 wrote:
      we are not grammar wiki!

      What are you talking about?

      This wiki needs to be grammatically correct.

      I agree with 120d. We need to be grammatically correct.

        Loading editor
    • if you want to talk about grammar: http://grammar.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

        Loading editor
    • Muchacha wrote:
      120d wrote:
      Goldenburg111 wrote:
      we are not grammar wiki!
      What are you talking about?

      This wiki needs to be grammatically correct.

      Exactly why I fixed the typo.

      It is different with people talking. You shouldn't change "I don't wanna be your friend anymore" to "I don't want to be your friend anymore" in a transcript, so you shouldn't in a discussion or a thread.

        Loading editor
    • 120d wrote:
      Muchacha wrote:
      120d wrote:
      Goldenburg111 wrote:
      we are not grammar wiki!
      What are you talking about?

      This wiki needs to be grammatically correct.

      Exactly why I fixed the typo.
      It is different with people talking. You shouldn't change "I don't wanna be your friend anymore" to "I don't want to be your friend anymore" in a transcript, so you shouldn't in a discussion or a thread.

      So, basically what I am trying to say is that Discussions, threads, transcripts, and other dialogue are off-limits when it comes to correcting grammar and spelling.

        Loading editor
    • 120d wrote:
      120d wrote:
      Muchacha wrote:
      120d wrote:
      Goldenburg111 wrote:
      we are not grammar wiki!
      What are you talking about?

      This wiki needs to be grammatically correct.

      Exactly why I fixed the typo.
      It is different with people talking. You shouldn't change "I don't wanna be your friend anymore" to "I don't want to be your friend anymore" in a transcript, so you shouldn't in a discussion or a thread.
      So, basically what I am trying to say is that Discussions, threads, transcripts, and other dialogue are off-limits when it comes to correcting grammar and spelling.

      Then why do YOU​ eliminate contractions from articles? 

        Loading editor
    • Contractions don't look good in articles. For discussion they are okay. But not for articles. See this in Wikipedia: [1]

        Loading editor
    • Muchacha wrote:
      120d wrote:
      120d wrote:
      Muchacha wrote:
      120d wrote:
      Goldenburg111 wrote:
      we are not grammar wiki!
      What are you talking about?

      This wiki needs to be grammatically correct.

      Exactly why I fixed the typo.
      It is different with people talking. You shouldn't change "I don't wanna be your friend anymore" to "I don't want to be your friend anymore" in a transcript, so you shouldn't in a discussion or a thread.
      So, basically what I am trying to say is that Discussions, threads, transcripts, and other dialogue are off-limits when it comes to correcting grammar and spelling.
      Then why do YOU​ eliminate contractions from articles? 

      First, articles are not off-limits. Second, they are not formal language. This wiki should have the most formal language possible.

        Loading editor
    • 54.91.35.130
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Wikia Spotlight

Random Wiki