It had to be started here as you were blocked from the Fanon wiki. But, this wiki does not appreciate insults being thrown due to a Fanon matter. If you're willing to discuss this peacefully, then I don't mind. Thanks! ;)
What?! You did not block me for a reason. I'm osrry but everyone user has the rights to block private messages from someone. It's power abuse to block somone just because thye blocked your private messages. A good admin should know that.
Please stop adding useless categories, such as those you did here. We are trying to keep categories organized well, but they are becoming a mess. "Cast and Crew" and "Crew and Cast" are the same thing. These are redundant categories and are unneeded. So please stop.
Dave, you have continuously been adding useless categories that I keep removing. These categories are useless, and we are trying to keep categories organized well. Please respond to these messages and explain your actions. Here you added "Females" under "Females characters" and "Female characters." All are unneeded.
Please do not ignore these messages, especially when two admins are trying to tell you something. It could result in a temporary block.
What category ? I stopped adding Females or are you talking about minor friends.By the way there is a category called Females Characters and that does not make sense Davebrayfbu (talk) 14:48, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
Then we remove it if it does not make sense. We don't add a new one, we remove it. All character articles get the category Category:Characters.
When you say "Minor friends" are you referring to friends of SpongeBob? Friends of Sandy? Friends of Patrick? Friends of Plankton? Friends of Tom? Friends of Fred? Friends of everyone? Minor friends is an unneeded category.
The only category that character articles need are Category:Characters and maintenance categories (such as stub); and that category is built into the template: Template:Characters
Hello again, Dave. I'm again a little confused by the category you've been adding to articles: A-Z. What is the purpose of this category? Don't forget we are trying to clamp down on unnecessary categories. Just be aware of that. :) --BobblesTalk 16:29, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
So, does that mean all articles would then be under that category? That would then mean that category wouldn't serve a purpose. I might not be understanding this correctly however. --BobblesTalk 16:35, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
It only wouldn't apply to articles that start with numbers I suppose. I'm not sure that category is necessary. We all know most articles start with the letters "A-Z". ;) --BobblesTalk 16:40, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
Okay. What I'm getting at is the fact that Categories are meant to define an articles place on a Wiki or what subject the article fits. Categories aren't meant to include the majority of the articles, not are they supposed to include things which aren't unique to one type of article. Categories like "Monster" or "Object" are acceptable. General categories like "A-Z" or "Fish" (in this Wikis case) are not needed. --BobblesTalk 16:46, October 21, 2012 (UTC)