AW10 (Message Wall | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
AW10 (Message Wall | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
||
Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
==Voting stage== |
==Voting stage== |
||
{{DiscussionBoxBegin}} |
{{DiscussionBoxBegin}} |
||
− | ===Introduction=== |
+ | ==='''Introduction'''=== |
− | During the [[ESB:Discussions/Improvement of voting system|concern stage]] I have been improving both voting systems bit by bit, so I do not have anything to change now. However, since I cannot guarantee you have seen that latest version of both voting systems, please reconsider both of them before voting on any one of it. After maximally 10 days, we will choose the system that has greater suppport. |
+ | During the [[ESB:Discussions/Improvement of voting system|concern stage]] of this discussion, I have been improving both voting systems bit by bit, so I do not have anything to change now. However, since I cannot guarantee you have seen that latest version of both voting systems, please reconsider both of them before voting on any one of it. After maximally 10 days, we will choose the system that has greater suppport. |
===Voting systems=== |
===Voting systems=== |
Revision as of 13:17, 12 December 2015
This page is a summary of the new discussion system of ESB.
Introduction
We have established policies and our own format of discussing important (or rather trivial) things at ESB over the past couple of years. We all have noticed there has been some flaws in the system. While many discussions have passed and the result has worked great, other proposals have passed that didn't have too much thought put into them.
AW10 has come up with having a "two stage" discussion format, which involves the following test discussions:
- 1. Concern Stage - non-voting stage which allows people to give their feedback on a certain topic, so that we can collect as much information and ideas as possible before putting them into a proposal to vote on.
- 2. Voting Stage - the voting stage is just like we have had before, but is expected to be much smoother and less controversial since all matters involving discussions were thought out and presented in the "Concern Stage."
You will also notice that AW10 has developed several templates that make the system more organized and user friendly.
So, here are the pros to the two-stage discussion format with the new system of templates:
- Allows for more community input
- Prevents hasty decisions
- More organized format
- More user friendly format
Installation
Templates needed
You need to have all of these templates created:
Template:DiscussionInstructionsSection|Concerns Template:DiscussionInstructionsSection|Voting Template:DiscussionConcernHeading Template:DiscussionConcernImporter Template:CreateNewConcernButton Template:CreateNewVoteButton Template:CreateNewScoreVoteButton Template:CreateNewVoteButton/import Template:CreateNewScoreVoteButton/import Template:CreateNewConcernButton/Concern<1-20> Template:CreateNewConcernButton/comment Template:CreateNewVoteButton/support Template:CreateNewVoteButton/oppose Template:CreateNewVoteButton/neutral Template:CreateNewScoreVoteButton/support<1-10> Template:CreateNewScoreVoteButton/oppose<1-10> Template:CreateNewScoreVoteButton/neutral0 Template:ConcernButton Template:VoteButton Template:ScoreVoteButton Template:Support Template:Neutral Template:Oppose Template:SupportVote Template:NeutralVote Template:OpposeVote Template:DiscussionBoxBegin Template:DiscussionBoxEnd Template:DiscussionBoxIndentBegin Template:DiscussionBoxIndentEnd Template:Isnumeric Template:RoundHalfUp Template:Clear
CSS code needed
You need to have this CSS applyed to your wiki:
/* DiscussionButtons */ .voteScoreSelect { text-align: center; font-size: 12pt; } .voteScoreSelect a { font-size: 15px; color: #FFF !important; padding: 3px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; border: 1px solid #000; border-radius: 5px; text-align: center; width: 17px; background: #005F9C; font-weight: bold; } .voteButtons a, .concernButtonSmall a { font-size: 14px; color: #FFF !important; padding: 0 4px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; border: 1px solid #000; border-radius: 5px; text-align: center; background: #005F9C; font-weight: bold; } .concernButtonBig a { font-size: 16px; color: #FFF !important; padding: 2px 5px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; border: 1px solid #000; border-radius: 5px; text-align: center; background: #005F9C; font-weight: bold; } .voteScoreSelect a:hover, .voteButtons a:hover, .concernButtonSmall a:hover, .concernButtonBig a:hover { background: #008BE3; }
JavaScript code needed
You need to have this JavaScript code applyed to your wiki:
if ( document.getElementById("ScoreVoteCountContainer") !== null ) { //collecting all votes var SupportVoteScores = document.getElementsByClassName("SupportVoteNum"); var NeutralVoteScores = document.getElementsByClassName("NeutralVoteNum"); var OpposeVoteScores = document.getElementsByClassName("OpposeVoteNum"); var votesCount = SupportVoteScores.length + NeutralVoteScores.length + OpposeVoteScores.length; var votesNumSum = 0; //processing support votes for (var i = 0; i < SupportVoteScores.length; i++) { if (SupportVoteScores[i].innerHTML === "NaN") { votesCount--; } else { votesNumSum += parseInt(SupportVoteScores[i].innerHTML); } } //prcessing oppose votes for (var i = 0; i < OpposeVoteScores.length; i++) { if (OpposeVoteScores[i].innerHTML === "NaN") { votesCount--; } else { votesNumSum -= parseInt(OpposeVoteScores[i].innerHTML); } } //defining vote status var currentVoteScore = Math.round( (votesNumSum / votesCount) * 100 ) / 100; var currentVoteStatus = ""; if ( currentVoteScore >= 1.00 ) { currentVoteStatus = '<span style="font-size:15px; font-weight:normal;"><img src="http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/spongebob/images/a/ab/Support.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/15?cb=20140913200712" alt="Support" height="15" width="15"> Community supports proposal with score "' + currentVoteScore.toFixed(2) + '".</span>'; } else { currentVoteStatus = '<span style="font-size:15px; font-weight:normal;"><img src="http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/spongebob/images/b/bc/Oppose.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/15?cb=20140913200954" alt="Oppose" width="15" height="15"> Community opposes proposal with score "' + currentVoteScore.toFixed(2) + '".</span>'; } //writing vote status to page document.getElementById("ScoreVoteCount").innerHTML = currentVoteStatus; }
Voting stage
Introduction
During the concern stage of this discussion, I have been improving both voting systems bit by bit, so I do not have anything to change now. However, since I cannot guarantee you have seen that latest version of both voting systems, please reconsider both of them before voting on any one of it. After maximally 10 days, we will choose the system that has greater suppport.
Voting systems
- Conventional Voting System (test page)
- [How are we voting on a proposal?] with Support, Nuetral, Oppose, Comment
- [How long voting stage will last?] 4 days with use of highlighted thread
- [How the score will be counted?] score = [ count() / count( + ) ] * 100
- [Min score for passing proposal?] score >= 70% (we count the score manually)
- Non-Conventional Voting System (test page)
- [How are we voting on a proposal?] with Support[1 to 10], Nuetral[0], Oppose[1 to 10]
- [How long voting stage will last?] 6 days with use of highlighted thread
- [How the score will be counted?] score = [ valueSum() - valueSum() ] / count( + + )
- [Min score for passing proposal?] score >= 1.00 (JavaScript counts the score)
Conclusion
So, in "Conventional Voting System" we are looking at percentage of support votes in count of all support and oppose votes, excluding neutrals. In "Non-Conventional Voting System" we are taking into account neutral votes, but by cleverly done math, we are preventing them from drastically influence the score. You need to tons of neutrals to drastically lover the score of non-conventional voting system.