Request for Bureaucrat Archive
The following bureaucratic request has been closed. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
User requesting bureaucrat: Nicko756 Date discussion closed: September 11, 2015 Result of discussion: Withdrawn. |
Nicko756 (wall • contribs • 39,140)
Requests by Nicko756 |
---|
see all requests |
Hi guys!
I've been a ESB member for over a year and a half, and an admin for over a year, and I believe I'm ready for bureaucratic rights. The main reason I am applying for crat is because we currently only have three, and AMK152 is the only active one. I would also like to help with discussions, admin requests, and be able to assist the community even more! Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 00:39, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
Support
- Strong Support - Mismag(W•C) 00:42, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support - PrezDubs messagewall 00:45, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Lets give it a shot. Haunted330 (talk) 00:58, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support - —Lewis2567 (Wall•Contribs) 01:31, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - The main reason I opposed your last request was that 5 crats is not needed. Patrick Star (Oh My....) 11:03, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - you've been admin for awhile
Koolkitty | Talk | Contribs | Edits |
---|
Neutral
Oppose
- Oppose - I would support, but you dont meet the agreements. AustinD-3 (Message Me Here!)
- Extremely Strong Oppose - I still believe it's too early. You have good contributions and are active, but in the past there have been issues with tension/controversy/behavior that will sometimes come up every once in a while. It's only been a month since your last request, and JCM stepping down doesn't really change much as he has been semi-active for years anyway. While SB456 and Zeo are by definition semi-active, they are still very much involved. The number of bureaucrats doesn't matter as 3 is still a good amount. I just don't feel you are ready yet and I believe there are others more qualified. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 15:38, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
-
- I have changed to "Extremely strong oppose" because there is some communication issues and he is pushy. Especially complaining about my vote here. No one has ever messaged me to complain about my vote. If he were truly bureaucratic material, he would accept it. Not complaint about it. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 23:21, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per AMK. Also, you seem to act like you can do whatever you want. Like a week or two ago, you added a section to the Character Infobox without permission by the community. 120d Talk Contribs 120d 15:50, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Ok, understand this. YOu are an awesome user, contributer, editor, and admin. So I'm not against you. I'm agiainst the request, because I feel with a little more time you'll get there. I don't feel I'm ready, and I've been admin longer. So, get to an extended time period, and then you'll be ready. Tan Ham Man 18:32,9/11/2015
Comments