Encyclopedia SpongeBobia
Register
Advertisement
Encyclopedia SpongeBobia

Wiki
Proposal Archive

The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: January 3, 2017


Result: Moved to voting.


Instructions

This is a page for creating and resolving concerns on the topic: "Discussion policies (revision 7)."

At the end of the page, there is a "Create New Concern" button, which you can use to voice your concerns or questions about the proposal. You can use the "Refresh This Discussion" button, which allows you to make sure that all changes have been saved.

After 7 days of discussion, the concerns stage will end. All points brought up during that phase will be taken into account and an administrator, assistant, or the proposal's creator can move the discussion to voting, modifying the original proposal with any changes discussed by the community.

You can also add your comments to existing concerns. On the other hand, if you have no concerns, then you just wait for the voting stage.

Have a happy discussion!

Proposal

After looking through the list of discussions, I propose the following amendments:

I. Discussions

  • 1. General
  • b. Stage 2: Voting stage
  • i. Any administrator and the user who opened the discussion are to consider everything that was concluded in the concern stage and create a new updated proposal together, thus concluding the concern stage and starting a voting stage.
  • ii. All users will be given a chance to vote.
  • iii. After seven (7) days of voting, the voting stage will be closed.
  • iv. If votes are casted after the seven (7) days have passed, the votes are invalidated.

-- ☧ Réjouissez-vous et soyez heureux, parce que le Messie est né! ☧ (Cans48)(talk) 02:21, December 28, 2016 (UTC)

Concerns

Resolved concern: I don't understand.

PreviewModifyComment

Shouldn't people already know that you cannot vote after the discussion has been closed? ➞§σпιҫᵀʰᵉξριҫッCourage 03:27, December 28, 2016 (UTC)

Sometimes, discussions are not closed at the proper time and people vote on them after they should've been closed. This does not happen a lot but has happened. -- ☧ Réjouissez-vous et soyez heureux, parce que le Messie est né! ☧ (Cans48)(talk) 03:32, December 28, 2016 (UTC)


Created concern: It would already be archived

PreviewModifyComment
But if the voting stage of a discussion is already passed 7 days, then it would be archived and protected already. And no one would edit it, except for assistants and admins, but they should already know not to. So this is pretty useless.  DanzxvFan8275 (MCUE)DanPic   

No, discussoins are usually not closed on time. An on occasion votes are addded after it should closed. This would invalidate the votes because they were casted after the dsicussions should've closed. -- ☧ Réjouissez-vous et soyez heureux, parce que le Messie est né! ☧ (Cans48)(talk) 17:21, December 28, 2016 (UTC)


Create New ConcernRefresh This DiscussionMonitor This Discussion

Advertisement