After all concerns from concern stage of this discussion has been resolved and taken into account, proposal located in "Proposal" section above has been created and put to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.
Hello! I'm Madiyunu, a current chat moderator and I have decided to create a proposal changing administration reviews to 3 months instead of 6.
The reason why I created this proposal is because I feel like six months may be a bit too long. I feel like three months is fair and would give great feedback on how the person is currently doing instead of waiting longer.
I also feel like it would be a bit more easier and more organized, as we have a lot of staff as of now, I think it'd be a good idea to do more with reviews.
1. Every six (6)three (3) months, all bureaucrats, administrators, assistants, discussion moderators, and chat moderators will be put through a review process so the community can assess their status to ensure the most qualified people remain in their positions.
2. Administration reviews will occur twicefour times per year:
a. February 10
b. May 10
bc. August 10
d. November 10
The policy changes were not part of the concerns stage, so I have added them here.
Voting concludes on October 9, 2017, at 5:04 p.m. EDT. DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E) 21:04, October 2, 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - I can't support lowering the administration review frequency to anything lower than 4 months. 3 months is too excessive. Nicko756(M•C•E)Sign! 20:51, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - Nicko, keep in mind that there are 32 users part of the administration and some of them have 3+ roles. These users must be evaluated on how they are doing in their position and these reviews happen in the administration reviews. After all these recent promotions, it makes a lot of sense to decrease it to only 3 months. Golfpecks(M•C•E) 22:46, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
Support - Six months is too much! Tyler730(M•C•E) 18:40, October 4, 2017 (UTC)