Proposal Archive
The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: May 21, 2015
|
Introduction
This petition recieved three endorsements regarding having a separate reviews wiki as part of SpongeBobia. While the subject of reviews has been discussed before, the question is, should we have a separate wiki, or should we include reviews right at ESB?
This discussion will end on Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 9:10 a.m., eastern time. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 13:04, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
This discussion has been extended to Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 9:10 a.m., eastern time. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 04:12, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
This discussion has been extended to Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 9:10 a.m., eastern time. If there still isn't a consensus by then, there will be an open discussion to offer alternative suggestions. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 15:55, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
Discussion
Use SpongeBob Reviews Wiki
- Support - As wiki creator and petitioner. Luis~SBCA M C 13:06, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
Neutral - see my reasons below. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 13:11, April 29, 2015 (UTC)- Support - Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 13:17, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
Neutral - Hmm... ZeoSpark Talk Contribs Edits 13:19,4/29/2015- Support - I do think it would be a good idea, as fans can share their opinions and not cause drama in the comments or threads. ~Prez 20:51, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - Meh. I don't know. Tan Ham Man 18:41,4/30/2015
- Neutral - I don't know. —Lewis2567 (Wall•Contribs) 20:50, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - We can already review episodes using their article comments or forum threads, so I'm not sure that we need an entire wiki for reviews. ~JCM 18:02, May 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - I agree with JCM. TheGamingSponge 06:25, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - I agree with JCM too. --PatrickFan (Talk) 19:52, May 7, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I agree with Prez. Jon Satos (talk) 05:21, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Great! EinsteinBlllllllllll 20:49, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - per my reasons below. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 21:27, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - 120d Talk Contribs 120d 23:44, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I will support as long as those two wikis will be linked well and if users agree, the reviews wiki improved with templates, which I can do with pleasure, to ease posting reviews. In other words, as long as users will be able to easily use the reviews wiki, I support. AW10 Talk Contribs E-Mail 09:55,5/9/2015
- Support - _ Hardink
- Neutral - Per above with JCM.-SonicTheEpic (talk) 01:07, May 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Dragonballgtgoku «Talk Page/Contribs» 02:56, May 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - ~Jersey
- Template:Strong Support Auron ♫ ♪ Everything is Awesome!!! ♪ ♫ 03:37,5/15/2015
- Support - See my reason below. SquidFan10 (talk) 03:47, May 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I think you can better have seperate wikis for this. Making reviews in comments/forum threads isn't a good idea when there'll come a lot of reviews. Having a second wiki which is strong affiliated with this one seems like a good idea. Though I think the reviews wiki needs a lot of stuff to be done (for example on the layout). 2Actimv talkContribs Edits 17:43, May 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - It has plenty of potential. I've had a look through and there are ways this wiki can be a great success. :) --Spongebob456 talk 17:47, May 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Lumoshi (talk)
- Support - per 2Actimv. TheAnimoWithin (talk) 03:29, May 16, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - After going over it, it will be better to keep it as a seperate wiki. Things could get messy if reviews are also held here. ZeoSpark Talk Contribs Edits 22:57,5/19/2015
Put Reviews at ESB
- Support - I am more inclined to support putting the reviews at ESB, whether it be a reviews tab on articles or something else. After all, the socializing within the network (besides Skype) is done here at ESB. Some people are uneasy about adding additional wikis to the network (including the unpopular SpongeBob Memes wiki) and it may be a better idea to try it out here first, where we are more likely to see activity in a reviews section. The reviews would require a series of templates and the structure built here could more easily accomodate that, as I have had ideas of a reviews "tab" functionality for some time now. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 13:11, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 13:17, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - The wiki's supposed to be an information database. I may be wrong but...I have another point. People keep sharing their opinions in the comments and sometimes lead to spam messages. Which is also another reason why the SBR is a good alternative to that. Luis~SBCA M C 13:24, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - Honestly, I'm still trying to decide which would be better. Though it will be a great idea to have it here, I wonder how we are going to do it. Are we going to have like a different section or page for the reviews and include a link somewhere onto the episode page to include it? Is it going to be included in the episode tab or something? It does seem like a good idea but it made get cluttered with all of those pages around? As for having the reviews at the other wiki, it's definately a good idea since that wiki will be solely on reviews on episodes and there are plently of episodes in the series. However, I do agree that it may be a bit much to keep going back and forth between wikis just to review episodes. Plus, the wiki is just developing so a lot more work is needed to be done there first before we can get serious with that wiki. I don't know for now... Both ideas seem good but they also have their con as well. I'd would see what others will think first but I if had to pick between the two, I'd choose this wiki since it saves having to constanly go to another one. ZeoSpark Talk Contribs Edits 13:34,4/29/2015
- Oppose - ~Prez 20:51, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Don't we already have enough issues? Not to be negative, but I don't want to see this wiki get ruined. Tan Ham Man 18:41,4/30/2015
- Template:Strong Support I don't see why not... —Lewis2567 (Wall•Contribs) 20:52, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Like I said above, we can already talk about episodes in the comments or in the forum, but I wouldn't be opposed to a review tab or something similar. ~JCM 18:02, May 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - Eh... Maybe. TheGamingSponge 06:25, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - --PatrickFan (Talk) 19:52, May 7, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per SBCA and Tan Ham Man. Jon Satos (talk) 05:21, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Extreme Oppose - I don't want on esb EinsteinBlllllllllll 20:48, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - 120d Talk Contribs 120d 23:44, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Isn't a wiki supposed to be a site of documentation? So doesn't it seem unbecoming to bog it down with fan content? Also, almost 100% of fans believe that the show stopped being good immediately after the first movie and has been horrible for years (myself included; I have no idea how you can keep doing this; I would've lost the strength to maintain a Spongebob wiki years ago). So wouldn't all the reviews of all the post-movie episodes be negative, and all the pre-movie episodes positive, or at best, a minute percentage of post-movie episode reviews would say that they were still inferior to before the movie came out? 8:49, May 12, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - This is a wikia only for SpongeBob information. We don't need a whole website just for reviews. -SonicTheEpic (talk) 01:10, May 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - Not completely sure whether or not to do so. Dragonballgtgoku «Talk Page/Contribs» 02:57, May 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - ~Jersey
03:30 May 15 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - I think its better to have facts on esb. Reviews vary so dramatically by taste it's often inconclusive. Auron ♫ ♪ Everything is Awesome!!! ♪ ♫ 03:34,5/15/2015
- Oppose - This wiki is an encyclopedia. Not a reviews place. SquidFan10 (talk) 03:47, May 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Oh-Pose - per SquidFan10. TheAnimoWithin (talk) 03:29, May 16, 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Extremely Strong Support TheImaginativeS 23:34, May 20, 2015