No edit summary |
m (Protected "ESB:Discussions/Sources/accepted" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
Revision as of 21:49, 25 January 2015
|
Proposal Archive
The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: January 25, 2015
|
|---|
Introduction
There have been controversies over certain sources of information. We need to have a set list of accepted sources to go on. If you have any comments about this, please start your own section. This is an ongoing discussion. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:02, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
Discussion
AMK152
- I think that the acceptable sources should include (as we have been doing) in-universe references (including episodes, shorts, books, video games, etc.), news outlets (although there may be some that may not be as reliable; we can work on this case by case), any kind of press release from Nickelodon, as well as social media of those involved with the series, which includes Twitter accounts of cast and crew members. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:02, December 16, 2014 (UTC)