ESB:Proposals/Requests for early voting/voting

	Proposal Archive The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page. Date Resolved: October 23, 2016 Result: Not passed.

Instructions

This page is the voting stage of this discussion: "Requests for early voting."

With all concerns from the concern stage of this discussion having been resolved and taken into account, the proposal located in the "Proposal" section above has been created and moved to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in the "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.

Have a happy voting!

Proposal

Here is Cans48's original proposal:

I think that we need a new type of request: to early vote. The reason for this is because some users may not be able to vote on requests because of wikibreak or they are not able to make an edit. This would also result in a new page named ESB:Requests for early voting, where you would put your reason for why you cannot vote, what request you need to vote on, and what the vote would look like, e.g. - Support -, - Neutral -, - Oppose -, etc. Thank you for reading my proposal.--☧ Mortem Christi resurrectionem confitemur, donec venias. ☧ (talk) 02:34, October 11, 2016 (UTC)

This voting stage will end on Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 4:10 p.m., eastern time. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 20:05, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting

Choose your input: Support • Neutral • Oppose • Comment

• Oppose - too complex and unnecessary. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 20:06, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose - I don't really understand this... Jersey the DIEHL (SpongeFreddy777) wall • contribs20:11, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

• Comment - That is not my fault as you did not make a concern. --❧Cans48❦ (talk) 20:39, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose - This is really complex and it looks kinda useless.  "For service and devotion"   TheOneFootTallBrickWall (talk) 20:20, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

• Support - Not a bad idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheThomas5252 (wall • contribs). Remember to sign your posts with ~~~~

• Oppose -  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  20:26, October 16, 2016 (UTC) 

• Support - as proposer. --❧Cans48❦ (talk) 20:39, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

• Support - I like the idea. --AlexJakob99

• Oppose - Per above.  ChocolateBrownieBoy ^(M•C•E) 

• Oppose - I really don't see why we need this.  trevorontario  w  c  clickme 

• Oppose - Seems way too much of a hassle just to vote at a later date. ZeoSpark  Talk  Contribs  Edits  21:32,10/16/2016 

• Comment - It appears you didn't read my proposal. This is to vote at an earlier date. --❧Cans48❦ (talk) 22:45, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose - ѕqυι∂∂ℓєωαя∂ ^{❮мεssαgε ωαℓℓ ● cσηтяιвυтισηs ● ε∂ιтcσυηт❯ 21:47, October 16, 2016 (UTC)}

• Oppose -  Chuck123456 ^(M•C•E)  05:42, October 17, 2016 (UTC) 
• Oppose - Roller (talk) 05:45, October 17, 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose - Spongebobkotek123

• Weak Support - It may be complex, but I see the point of this proposal.  AW10  Talk  Contribs  E-Mail  01:30,10/18/2016 

• Support - AustinD-3 (Message Me Here!)

• Neutral - I'm pretty swayed on this. Luis~SBCA ^M C   08:28,10/20/2016 

• Oppose - ➞§σпιҫᵀʰᵉξριҫッ 00:39, October 23, 2016 (UTC)