Proposal Archive
The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: December 26, 2015
|
Instructions
This page is the voting stage of this discussion: "Improvement of voting system."
With all concerns from the concern stage of this discussion having been resolved and taken into account, the proposal located in the "Proposal" section above has been created and moved to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in the "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.
Have a happy voting!
Proposal
Introduction
During the concern stage of this discussion, I have been improving both voting systems bit by bit, so I do not have anything to change now. However, since I cannot guarantee you have seen that latest version of both voting systems, please reconsider both of them before voting on any one of it. After maximally 10 days, we will choose the system that has greater suppport.
Voting systems
Conventional Voting System (test page)
- [How are we voting on a proposal?] with Support, Nuetral, Oppose, Comment
- [How long voting stage will last?] 4 days with use of highlighted thread
- [How the score will be counted?] score = [ count() / count( + ) ] * 100
- [Min score for passing proposal?] score >= 70% (we count the score manually)
Non-Conventional Voting System (test page)
- [How are we voting on a proposal?] with Support[1 to 10], Nuetral[0], Oppose[1 to 10]
- [How long voting stage will last?] 6 days with use of highlighted thread
- [How the score will be counted?] score = [ valueSum() - valueSum() ] / count( + + )
- [Min score for passing proposal?] score >= 1.00 (JavaScript counts the score)
Conclusion
So, in "Conventional Voting System" we are looking at percentage of support votes in count of all support and oppose votes, excluding neutrals. In "Non-Conventional Voting System" we are taking into account neutral votes, but by cleverly done math, we are preventing them from drastically influence the score. You need to tons of neutrals to drastically lover the score of non-conventional voting system.
Voting
Current Voting System
(preview • modify • refresh)- Support - ~JCM 19:53, December 12, 2015 (UTC)
Conventional Voting System
(preview • modify • refresh)- Support - This system without counting neutral votes is good. AW10 Talk Contribs E-Mail 11:20,12/12/2015
- Support - TheJonahReport M C 15:56, December 12, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Per above. --Spongebob456 talk 16:11, December 12, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - AustinD-3 (Message Me Here!)
- Support - Per AW10.
ChocolateBrownieBoy | Talk | Contribs | Edits |
---|
- Oppose - If neutral votes are no longer considered in the final tally, there's nothing separating them from comments. ~JCM 19:48, December 12, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Focus (on me.) 11:19, December 13, 2015 (UTC)
Non-Conventional Voting System
(preview • modify • refresh)- Neutral - This system is good in theory, but it may not work well in practice. AW10 Talk Contribs E-Mail 11:21,12/12/2015
- Neutral - Per AW10 -TheJonahReport M C 15:53, December 12, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I think this is a good system.
ChocolateBrownieBoy | Talk | Contribs | Edits |
---|
- Neutral - I don't really think we need to make changes to our current system. ~JCM 19:49, December 12, 2015 (UTC)