The following discussion is part of a series.
Proposal Archive
The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: July 7, 2014
|
Introduction[]
Since ESB:Discussions/Image names for episodes (part 2) ended, there are various ideas that were dismissed.
Every naming format that has an average negative rating were removed:
- (-1) Help-Wanted-001, Reef-Blower-001, Tea-at-the-Treedome-001
- (-2) Help-Wanted001, Reef-Blower001, Tea-at-the-Treedome001
- (-1) 001a001, 001b001, 001c001
- (-1.5) 1a-1, 1b-1, 1c-1
- (-2) 1a-001, 1b-001, 1c-001
- (-2) 1a001, 1b001, 1c001
- (-3) Help Wanted Gallery001, Reef Blower Gallery001, Tea at the Treedome Gallery001
All other suggestions remain in the discussion. This includes 4 with average postive ratings. As with the last discussion, please say what you think for each entry.
This discussion will end on Sunday, July 6, 2014 at 3 PM, eastern time. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 19:00, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
Discussion[]
001-001, 002-001, 003-001 (Ave. Rating: 4.5)[]
- Oppose - could get confusing.
Auron Who you callin' pinhead?! 15:00,7/6/2014
- Support - nice and simple. --Spongebob456 talk 19:05, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Simple and easy. Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 23:56, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Support - per above. Nice and simple. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 23:29, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Support - This one is alright. ZeoSpark Talk Contribs Edits 23:36,6/30/2014
- Oppose - It is simple, but provides individual number, not real production number. Therefore, it doesn't have anything offical. AW10 Talk Contribs E-Mail 02:08,7/3/2014
- Support - Might as well support this, since it's going to win anyway. 15:43,7/4/2014 Muchacha (W•C)OVERTIME?!!!
HelpWanted1, ReefBlower1, TeaattheTreedome1 (Ave. Rating: 2)[]
- Support - Nice and clear.
Auron Who you callin' pinhead?! 15:01,7/6/2014
- Support - Yup, like this. --Spongebob456 talk 19:05, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Strongly Support - I like this better than the numbers because there is no need to look up what production number the episode has. Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 23:56, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - I would rather use "000" than this system. Also, names could get very long.
- Support - This is method I've been using so I support mainly because I'm used to it. ZeoSpark Talk Contribs Edits 23:36,6/30/2014
- Support - This is good. AW10 Talk Contribs E-Mail 02:08,7/3/2014
HelpWanted001, ReefBlower001, TeaattheTreedome001 (Ave. Rating: 1.5)[]
- Neutral - - why the naughts? --Spongebob456 talk 19:05, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral - I prefer the one up above. Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 23:56, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral - it's better with 000, but the names could get very long. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 23:30, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nah. It will get too long. ZeoSpark Talk Contribs Edits 23:36,6/30/2014
- Oppose - Zeros complicate things. AW10 Talk Contribs E-Mail 02:08,7/3/2014
001a-001, 001b-001, 001c-001 (Ave. Rating: 1.5)[]
- Oppose - too complex. --Spongebob456 talk 19:05, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral - Letters aren't needed. Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 23:56, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - I don't like the use of the letters anymore, either. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 23:29, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - Production letters wouldn't work since there are episodes like Have You Seen This Snail that don't have any. ZeoSpark Talk Contribs Edits 23:36,6/30/2014
- Support - This is better because it shows real production number, which can be both, with or without a letter. AW10 Talk Contribs E-Mail 02:08,7/3/2014
- Extremely Strong Support - I prefer this one over the winning one. 15:43,7/4/2014 Muchacha (W•C)OVERTIME?!!!