Encyclopedia SpongeBobia
Register
Advertisement
Encyclopedia SpongeBobia

Wiki
Proposal Archive

The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: July 11, 2014


Result: Option A to not limit articles passes.


Introduction

There has been some complaints that the lengths of articles in regards to people, such as voice actors and crew members, may get long (such as that of Tom Kenny), and some may wish that the article be limited, while others would rather have all information. There are a few options.

Proposal

  • Option A - allow any and all information on people articles
  • Option B - limit the length of people articles (we would need further discussion if this one is accepted)
  • Option C - limit only the filmography sections (such as using only selected credits)
  • Option D - eliminate filmography sections, refer readers to Wikipedia

This discussion will end on Friday, July 11, 2014 at midnight, eastern time. AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:16, July 4, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Option A

  • Allow any and all information on people articles

Support Strong Support - Limiting content would not benefit SpongeBobians

WolfWink_L.gif Auron May the odds be ever in your favor! Ammy.gif   02:38,8/23/2015 


Support Strong Support - We shouldn't limit pages. Pretzel 📪 🔎


Support Strong Support -  Nicko756 (MCE) Sign!Dp  03:19, July 4, 2014 (UTC) 


Support Strong Support - Per above.  03:20,7/4/2014 Oie 1416180TW0S7lYbMuchacha (WC)OVERTIME?!!!Rock-a-Bye Bivalve 71 


Support Strong Support - More Information on everything would help this wiki Grow more faster and more better, why would limiting information help anything? Tominator777 (talk) 03:21, July 4, 2014 (UTC)


Support Strong Support - we should not limit these articles AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:22, July 4, 2014 (UTC)


Neutral Neutral leaning Support - After thinking for a bit I realise that these articles may get too crowded and be way too long. Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 (talk) 03:26, July 4, 2014 (UTC)


Support Support - - agree - why limit them? --Spongebob456 talk 15:31, July 4, 2014 (UTC)


Support Support -  AW10  Talk  Contribs  E-Mail  19:51,7/6/2014 


Oppose Oppose - It will get too long if we do it this way.  120d  Talk  Contribs  6:04,7/8/2014 

Option B

  • Limit the length of people articles (we would need further discussion if this one is accepted)

Oppose Strong Oppose - We shouldn't limit articles. Pretzel 📪 🔎


Oppose Strong Oppose - I am very much against limiting these articles. AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:22, July 4, 2014 (UTC)


Oppose Strong Oppose - No. Just no.  03:26,7/4/2014 Oie 1416180TW0S7lYbMuchacha (WC)OVERTIME?!!!Rock-a-Bye Bivalve 71 


Oppose Oppose - - Why limit them? Articles are forever expanding. --Spongebob456 talk 15:31, July 4, 2014 (UTC)


Neutral Neutral leaning Support - I can see the reasoning in this. Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 (talk) 06:08, July 8, 2014 (UTC)


Option C

  • Limit only the filmography sections (such as using only selected credits)

Oppose Strong Oppose - I am very much against limiting these articles. AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:22, July 4, 2014 (UTC)


Oppose Strong Oppose - Shouldn't limit articles. Pretzel 📪 🔎


Oppose Oppose - Full info is key.  03:26,7/4/2014 Oie 1416180TW0S7lYbMuchacha (WC)OVERTIME?!!!Rock-a-Bye Bivalve 71 


Oppose Oppose - - per above. --Spongebob456 talk 15:31, July 4, 2014 (UTC)

Option D

  • Eliminate filmography sections, refer readers to Wikipedia

Neutral Neutral leaning Support - This makes since. We really don't need these sections. Pretzel 📪 🔎


Oppose Strong Oppose - I am very much against limiting these articles. AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:22, July 4, 2014 (UTC)


Oppose Extremely Strong Oppose - No. See above.  03:26,7/4/2014 Oie 1416180TW0S7lYbMuchacha (WC)OVERTIME?!!!Rock-a-Bye Bivalve 71 


Oppose Oppose - - see above. --Spongebob456 talk 15:31, July 4, 2014 (UTC)

Comments


Advertisement