ESB:User rights review/Auron~Guardian (part 2)

Open Proposal

The following is an ongoing proposal. Please feel free to voice your opinion, but be sure to follow the rules.

How proposals work

Concerns stage

Someone brings up a topic for a proposal.
The community discusses that topic.

Voting stage

The proposal is brought to a vote, taking into account any changes discussed by the community.
The community votes.

You can use any of the following prior to your comments to show your opinion.

{{Support}} • {{Neutral}} • {{Oppose}} • {{Change}} • {{Comment}} • {{Reply}} • {{Question}}
Neutral votes do not count in determining the outcome percentage.

Introduction

See here: ESB:Discussions/Auron~Guardian sockpuppetry case for the original discussion. As there were many different opinions in deciding the severity of the punishment or not punishing Auron from certain things

Discussion

Here, there are different choices as to the punishment based on the sockpuppetry case and chat discussion. This discussion will end on Thursday, October 16, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:20, October 9, 2014 (UTC)

Block

How long should Auron be blocked from editing?

Block: None

Template:Extremely Strong Support while Auron's actions may be punishable by a block, he is not hostile and has taken this very well. He deserves no block. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:23, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Oppose This guy broke everyone's trust, lied, cheated, deceived, manipulated... he broke local rules, global rules. Having no block is just plain ridiculous. Joey ^(talk)
Template:Weak Oppose I agree Auron should be blocked. I do however feel that the time has passed. If we were to block him it should have been done much sooner and then have a discussion. --Spongebob456 ^talk 15:39, October 9, 2014 (UTC)

Block: 1 week

Template:Extremely Strong Oppose while Auron's actions may be punishable by a block, he is not hostile and has taken this very well. He deserves no block. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:23, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Oppose Wayyyyy too little. Joey ^(talk)
Oppose - Per Joseph. --Spongebob456 ^talk 15:40, October 9, 2014 (UTC)

Block: 1 month

Template:Extremely Strong Oppose while Auron's actions may be punishable by a block, he is not hostile and has taken this very well. He deserves no block. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:23, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Support This is reasonable. Joey ^(talk)
Support - Per Joseph. --Spongebob456 ^talk 15:40, October 9, 2014 (UTC)

Block: 1 year

Template:Extremely Strong Oppose while Auron's actions may be punishable by a block, he is not hostile and has taken this very well. He deserves no block. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:23, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Support I strongly support this. Joey ^(talk)
Oppose - Too long. --Spongebob456 ^talk 15:41, October 9, 2014 (UTC)

UOTM suspension

How long should Auron be suspended from nomination for UOTM?

UOTM: None

Template:Extremely Strong Oppose I highly doubt he will win anyway. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:24, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Oppose Like, duh. :P Joey ^(talk)

UOTM: 6 months

Template:Strong Support fair and most people agree. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:24, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Oppose Nope. Joey ^(talk)
Template:Extremely Strong Oppose Per Joseph. --Spongebob456 ^talk 15:41, October 9, 2014 (UTC)

UOTM: 1 year

Strong Oppose - too harsh. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:24, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Support Auron needs to be blocked from UOTM for 1 year. Here’s the logic: You get a 6 month suspension if you ask someone to vote for you. Well, guess what? AURON MADE ANOTHER ACCOUNT TO VOTE FOR HIM! That’s a billion times worse. In real life, that’s vote fraud… A FEDERAL CRIME! The punishment needs to at least be double. Joey ^(talk)

Rollback and Chat mod suspension

How long should Auron be suspended from Rollback and Chat mod?

Rollback & chat mod: 2 months

Support - fair enough. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:26, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose - Too small. Joey ^(talk)

Rollback & chat mod: 6 months

Neutral - it's okay. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:26, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Weak Support - Alrighty. Joey ^(talk)

Rollback & chat mod: 1 year

Oppose - too harsh. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:26, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Strong Support Suits the crime. Joey ^(talk)

Administrator suspension

How long should Auron be suspended from requesting to be an administrator?

Admin: 6 months

Support - fair. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:26, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Oppose Too small. Joey ^(talk)

Admin: 12 months

Neutral - It's okay. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:26, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Support - Still too small IMO. Joey ^(talk)

Admin: 18 months

Oppose - too harsh. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:26, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Template:Extremely Strong Support Suits the crime. Joey ^(talk)

Voting suspension

How long should Auron be suspended from voting in discussions?

Voting: 1 month

Support - fair for Auron's abuse of the system, but this is a wiki and everyone has a voice. The suspension should not be too long. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:28, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose -He had another account to vote for what he wanted, and he abused the whole discussion process! He needs to be suspended from voting on discussions for at least 3 months. Joey ^(talk)

Voting: 3 months

Neutral - perhaps a bit too far. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:28, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Support - Just right. Joey ^(talk)

Voting: 6 months

Strong Oppose - too harsh. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:28, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Support - Can't hurt. Joey ^(talk)

Voting: 12 months

Strong Oppose - too harsh. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:28, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose - Eh, a little much. Joey ^(talk)

Voting: 18 months

Template:Extremely Strong Oppose WAY too harsh. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 14:28, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose - Too long. Joey ^(talk)