ESB:Block reviews/SNCFTGVrecord574

	Block reviews archive The following block review has been closed. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page. User requesting review: SNCFTGVrecord574 Date discussion closed: May 6, 2017 Result of discussion: Not passed.

SNCFTGVrecord574 (wall • contribs • 0)

Information	Details
Blocking administrator	Depth Strider 10
Length of block	infinite
Reason for block	Continuing to create multiple accounts.
User starting review	SNC Unblock
Reason for review	Ring has admitted that he made the SNC socks. SNC shouldn't be blocked because Ring impersonated him. I have a picture that shows proof that it wasn't SNC. A PM from Ring. This picture isn't fake. He really did admit.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

• Oppose - we do not accept screenshots as proof. saying it isn't fake only raises suspicion. ѕqυι∂∂ℓєωαя∂ ^{❮мεssαgε ωαℓℓ ● cσηтяιвυтισηs ● ε∂ιтcσυηт❯ 21:59, April 20, 2017 (UTC)}
• Comment - But you should. Renember Ring is blocked for socking? Well, he did admit every sock he made. He made the SNC socks. SNC Unblock (talk) 22:03, April 20, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Squiddleward is right  The Flan/Takane Fan ^(M•C•E)  Flandre rocks!
• Oppose - Make socks is bad. Qwertyxp2000 II (talk | contribs) 01:31, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose -  HannahRae ^(M•C•E)  06:39, April 21, 2017 (UTC) 
• Oppose - We don't accept screenshots, Ring also claimed that he did not make these socks, not that I believe him. Oh and why should we Unblock him if it is one of Ring's socks?  SpongeBot678 ^(M•C•E)  06:49, April 21, 2017 (UTC) 
• Oppose - If he made those SNC socks, they should also be banned. Also, I made a video on YouTube saying why screenshots can't be used as evidence. The Ninja5 Empire (Message Wall) 06:59, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - per Squiddle Auron ⚡ Yeah, that's right baby! Welcome to my locker! ⚡  
• Oppose - The gamer 987654321 (M.W. B. C.) 10:12, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - I knew it. Bigfatonionslice    ^{Wall Contribs}
• Extremely Strong Oppose - ...  DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E)  18:32, April 21, 2017 (UTC) 
• Extremely Strong Oppose - DURR PLANT!  Chuck123456 ^(M•C•E)  19:22, April 21, 2017 (UTC) 
• Very Strong Oppose - Per above, especially Jackninja5DipperGravityFalls. If someone impersonates you, then you should really tell the admins BEFORE they blocked you for sockpuppetry. Mentioning it after only makes you look more suspicious as you are just looking for an excuse to evade the block. Cheesie 19:52, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - -TheOneFootTallBrickWall 08:24, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Extremely Strong Oppose - Can't believe how stubborn some people can be now. Sponge o' Mystery (Depth Strider 10) 08:47, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose -  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  04:09, May 6, 2017 (UTC) 

Comments

• Comment - That picture is fake, the metadata claims the user used paint.net to make the picture.  SpongeBot678 ^(M•C•E)  07:04, April 21, 2017 (UTC)