|
Block reviews archive
The following block review has been closed. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
User requesting review: FrenchSpongeBob77777 Date discussion closed: June 22, 2018 Result of discussion: Not passed. |
|---|
FrenchSpongeBob77777 (wall • contribs • )
| Information | Details |
|---|---|
| Blocking administrator | Depth Strider 10 |
| Length of block | infinite |
| Reason for block | Sockpuppet of User:Jackbradley2006 |
| User starting review | RedBomb1 |
| Reason for review | Much like Expert at Terraria said for his support reason on Jodan111's block review, "Spongefan13 is not a sock of Jodan111. No one could have socked for that long." That is true and the same case for FrenchSpongeBob77777. If that was not true, then an admin would have called Expert out for saying "false information" sice admins are supposed to be role models and tourists to the community. If FrenchSpongebob really was a sock then the admins would have noticed months ago (considering he got away with it for like 10 months) and blocked him or requested Fandom staff to do an IP check. The admins would have noticed a long time ago considering the other French SpongeBob accounts that have been made. FrenchSpongeBob was one of the best editors and one of the most sweetest and innocent users ever. So was Jackbradley. I believe that Jack did nothing wrog and was extremely friendly. He was so misunderstood and underappreciated that it's unbelievable. I know how it feels to be misunderstood and bullied. That's why I sympathize with this user. RedBomb1 (M•C•E)  21:51, June 14, 2018 (UTC)
|
Support
Extremely Strong Support - Per my reasoning. Neutral
Oppose
Oppose - Jackbradley has been constantly sockpuppeting since late 2016. Incase you didn’t know, Jack was banned from chat, and was complaining about it constantly, and someone reported him to FANDOM staff for being underage. So he started sockpuppeting, and this account is one of his sockpuppets, so it was blocked. The block is perfectly fair, we’ve never made exceptions for sockpuppets, and this shouldn’t be the first exception. SpongeBot678 (M•C•E) 06:17, June 15, 2018 (UTC) - Oppose - Per SpongeBot. There's no reason to unblock a sock account. Figmeister (W•C•E) 06:54, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - hell no. Chuck123456 (M•C•E) 08:31, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - just look at his message wall on Jackbradley2006 HappBunn (talk) 08:36, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Extremely Strong Oppose - no. NO. absolutely not. not only the fact that he instantly told me it was him when i asked him about it, but he's not "innocent" OR "extremely friendly" in any way. in fact, through some strange discord chats my friends and i have unfortunately had with him, he's been nothing but rude, selfish, and perverted, and has stalked individuals and made extensive death threats towards us countless times over the dumbest of things, including but not limited to: not giving him the sorani dub and blocking him for stalking us and calling out the things he's said. and about being misunderstood, trust me, i reluctantly know the true side of him as i've already said. see, i once tried to accept him as a person despite warnings. i soon found out the only reason he wasn't making death threats for a couple of days is because he thought it'd get him some dubs. so, the reason nobody (except you) likes him is because he's an immature, lying, brutal beggar who i strongly believe should not be let back onto the wiki or i'll lose the one ounce of respect i had for this place SPRUCON HENI :() 08:59, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - i have to say, you know how to make me laugh, red DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E) 10:37, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - If there was one thing you did successfully here, you brought the attention you desired. Rocky Lobster (M•C•E)
- Oppose - People have said it all. The most expensive boss, Alex.sapre (talk) 13:42, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - No reason to unblock a sockpuppet. Anthony2306 (W•C•L•E) 13:54, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - I do support the idea of "innocent until proven guilty, but there's so much proof that they are guilty. They even have another sock called FrenchSpongeBob777, which looks way too similar to this username and there is no way that this is just coincidental. Judging by your request to have them as UOTM, you admire their edits, but their contributions do not matter as much as the fact that they are a sock. Nothing against you, but sock puppets should not be defended. Ɔ • W • blɿoWɘʜTxoЯɘƨɘɘʜƆ 14:20, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Absolutely not. (Contact • Contrib) 21:32, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sock puppet. •кσσℓкιттү <мεssαgε ωαℓℓ> (=^ ◡ ^=)• 22:33, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
Oppose - Jackbradley has been constantly sockpuppeting since late 2016. Incase you didn’t know, Jack was banned from chat, and was complaining about it constantly, and someone reported him to FANDOM staff for being underage. So he started sockpuppeting, and this account is one of his sockpuppets, so it was blocked. The block is perfectly fair, we’ve never made exceptions for sockpuppets, and this shouldn’t be the first exception. 
Comments
- Comment - >If FrenchSpongebob really was a sock then the admins would have noticed months ago
Comment - >If FrenchSpongebob really was a sock then the admins would have noticed months agoIt's not like we can notice a sockpuppet the minute they join (unless of course they had the same username), that's like saying "if this person truly robbed a bank, why did no one see it coming when they were born." SpongeBot678 (M•C•E) 07:24, June 15, 2018 (UTC)